Now, before you roll your eyes or run away, this is not going to be a political post. I promise. While I sometimes discuss politics on this forum, today is not the day. I have been mulling over some thoughts lately about stereotyping as it relates to writing, especially “genre” writing. A post from a great blog I just started following volleyed the idea back to the forefront of my mind. You can (and should) read it here. In it Misha Burnett discusses the origins of different “genres” as well as how they have been manipulated, reversed, and inverted over time. He points out that literature (and arguably any creative venture) is in constant flux, a refreshing contrast to a more widely held thought. A more commonly held idea states that “nothing is unique” or “everything has been done before.” It’s a terribly depressing thought. But there is also the sage advice a professor gave me: “steal from other writers.” Obviously he was not condoning plagiarism, instead he was telling us to borrow, to twist, to bend things that have been done before and to make them our own.
One of the examples Mr. Burnett uses is horror fiction and particularly vampire fiction. *cue reader eye-roll* Stay with me on this one. Bram Stoker’s Dracula was arguably the first “popular fiction” novel on vampires (to my limited knowledge), but obviously it wasn’t the last. That book spawned countless more creative works dealing with vampires, from Anne Rice’s novels to The Series That Shall Not Be Named, to the content on the shelves of the Young Adult section in any bookstore, to my current guilty pleasure, the TV show “Vampire Diaries.” So my question is: What’s wrong with that? People say that vampire fiction, or werewolf fiction, or any of the current “trendy” topics are so cliche and that real writers wouldn’t waste their time with such a topic. Watch out, because Bram Stoker and Anne Rice might come after you with a stake. I agree that there is plenty of t e r r i b l e Young Adult (and Adult) fiction that has been spawned by the vampire craze, but take a walk down the Adult Romance aisle and tell me that is all good writing. I’m using vampire fiction as an example because a) too much Netflix and b) my generation is the generation that raved over Twilight…er…The Series That Shall Not Be Named. I’ve said before, I’ve read the books, seen the movies (even went to a few midnight premieres), and enjoyed them. The Twilight series is entertaining. It’s not high quality, academia writing–but why should it be?
Harry Potter can easily join the conversation as well. J.K. Rowling is not the first person to write about boarding school, magic, or witches and wizards, but she spun the common subjects her way. If you boil it down to its barest bones, Harry Potter is a coming of age story and, as every high school English class I ever took taught me, bildungsroman has been around since the dawn of time. So why do we look down our noses with disdain when writers choose to write about subjects that are popular or “cliche”? In one sense, the saying that “nothing is new” is encouraging; you have plenty of examples to learn from as you seek to create something that has your personal fingerprints all over it. So to writers: if you want to write about vampires–do it. If you want to write detective novels–do it. But make it your own.
To readers: read whatever you want to read, reading should be about enjoyment and if you learn something or are inspired or affected along the way, so much the better. Readers have another responsibility, too, and that is to try new things. If you are a fantasy reader (guilty) read some non-fantasy, read some autobiographies, read some classics. This applies to writers as well–read voraciously, whatever you can get your hands on. If you hate a book, never read it again (I suggest getting cheap/used/kindle books just in case). If you love it, read it again until it falls apart, until the pages are stained with tears and crumbs and dirt and memories. But don’t let the stereotypes of genre bind you, cage you in, or prevent you from reading, writing, and experiencing.
“nothing is unique” or “everything has been done before.” It’s a terribly depressing thought.”-so true! I like that you’ve talked about how writers should make things their own, because often writers are ashamed to speak honestly about how ideas can be borrowed and re-shaped to fit our own creativity and vision. Great post.
Thank you so much – for reading and for liking what you read! I think it’s interesting that the concept of “borrowing” in art and especially in writing seems so frowned upon when really, everyone does it! That’s why I think writers should read as much as possible–both for enjoyment and for new ideas!
Good advice about expanding your reading horizons, whether you write or not. This is why I wholeheartedly support public libraries: you can take out any book with no real cost, then focus your money on the books that you burn to own.
Glad you liked the article.
Thanks so much Dave! And forgive me for not giving more credit to your excellent blog! Too many tabs open at once in my browser is to blame. And great point about the library, I’m horrified at how long it’s been since I visited one!
I recognise the too many tabs issue; I have lost time and direction on many occasions to opening each interesting page in a new tab.
I agree and believe that most ideas have been explored and taken, and that the only way to make them truly unique (and yours) is to mix them with the voice within our hearts and our minds. I love the idea that are a hundred or even a thousand ways to tell the same story. An interesting post 🙂
Thank you for your words! And the idea of the hundreds of ways to tell the same story is alluring—it would make an excellent prompt if I’m ever suffering from writer’s block to go back and re-write even my own work differently!
You’re welcome. I hope will inspire you 🙂